Good KPIs for online franchise marketing measure two things per location: how often the location is seen and what that delivers in actions such as calls, direction requests or appointments. Without that split, you are steering on gut feeling. In our benchmark of 500 Google Business Profiles across 100 chains, only 40% were fully completed, so the first gains often lie in the basics.
Why does a franchise brand need different KPIs from an independent business?
An independent shop looks at one profile and one website. A franchise brand looks at dozens or hundreds of locations at once. The question then is not only whether things are going well, but also where they are falling behind. An average across the whole chain hides exactly the locations that need attention.
That is why we work with KPIs that you can break down per location and then add up to region and brand level. Head office sees the total, the franchisee sees their own figures and can compare themselves with locations of the same size. That makes discussions in the franchisee council more concrete.
According to the NFV, the Netherlands had 936 franchise brands with a combined 34,937 locations in reference year 2025. On average that comes to dozens of locations per brand. At that scale, tracking each location by hand is not sustainable, so the definition of every KPI must be fixed in advance and the data must be collected automatically.

Leading KPIs and outcome KPIs
Leading KPIs such as views, rankings and reach tell you something about opportunities. Outcome KPIs such as actions, leads and cost per result tell you something about returns. You need both: measuring results alone does not tell you why a location is declining.
Which metrics per channel should a franchise organisation track?
Not every channel delivers the same kind of figure. Below, for each channel, is the KPI we include first in measurable results per location. Start with this set and only expand once the basics are running smoothly.
| Channel | Leading KPI | Outcome KPI | Data source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Business Profile | Views in Search and Maps | Call clicks, direction requests, website clicks | Performance data per profile |
| Apple Business Connect | Views of the place card | Actions via buttons on the place card | Insights in Business Connect |
| Bing Places | Presence and accuracy of the listing | Clicks from Bing Maps | Bing Places account |
| Organic Google | Rankings for local keywords | Visits and conversions on the location page | Search Console and web analytics |
| AI assistants | Mentions for fixed test questions | Referral traffic from AI | Own test set and web analytics |
| Reviews | Number of new reviews per month | Response time and average rating | Profiles and review platforms |
| Advertising | Impressions and clicks | Cost per lead or appointment | Google Ads, Microsoft Ads, Meta Ads |
Map services
For visibility per location in Google Maps, call clicks and direction requests are the most direct signals of physical customer interest. Apple and Bing provide less detail, but precisely because many chains skip them, presence and accuracy already count as a KPI there.
AI visibility
AI assistants do not provide view counts. So we measure with a fixed list of test questions per region and note whether the franchise brand or location is mentioned. Read more about that approach under GEO for franchise brands.
How do you define KPIs so that locations can be compared fairly?
A KPI without a fixed definition leads to debate instead of action. For each metric, record what you count, over which period and how you correct for differences between locations. A location in a city centre simply gets more views than one on a business park.
That is why we prefer to compare with the location's own previous period and with a group of similar locations, not with the chain average. Use ratios where possible: actions per thousand views says more than the absolute number of actions.
| Element | Why | How we measure it |
|---|---|---|
| Name and formula | Everyone calculates the same way | Fixed calculation rule in the dashboard |
| Period | Seasons and weekdays distort figures | Month, compared with the same month last year |
| Normalisation | Locations differ in setting | Per thousand views or per comparable group |
| Threshold | You only want to see real deviations | Alert when a decline falls outside the normal range |
| Owner | Someone has to take action | Name of the location or head office per KPI |
| Action on deviation | Measuring without follow-up is pointless | Fixed step, for example checking the profile |
Which measurement mistakes do we often see at franchise chains?
The most common mistake is too many KPIs at once. A report with forty figures does not get read. Choose two or three metrics per goal and keep the rest available for anyone who wants to dig deeper.
Second mistake: reporting only vanity metrics such as followers or impressions. These rise easily without a location gaining more customers. Link every reach figure to an outcome KPI.
Third mistake: only counting reviews. In the same benchmark, only 6 of the 100 chains responded to reviews within 24 hours. Response time is therefore a KPI that quickly sets you apart. In online reputation management per location we include that time as standard.
Fourth mistake: judging advertising costs at chain level. A campaign can look profitable nationally while a few locations are losing money. In measurable advertising campaigns we break costs down per location.
How do you turn KPIs into a decision? A fictional worked example
Take a fictional franchise brand with 30 locations in the Growth package. That costs 30 x €400 = €12,000 per month excl. VAT, see fixed pricing per location. The board asks: what does it deliver? The table below shows how to answer that with KPIs. All figures are fictional.
| KPI | Location A (fictional) | Location B (fictional) | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile views | 12,000 | 11,500 | Comparable visibility |
| Actions (call, directions, website) | 480 | 230 | B converts visibility poorly |
| Actions per 1,000 views | 40 | 20 | The ratio reveals the difference |
| Average review response time | 1 day | 9 days | Possible cause at B |
| Profile complete | Yes | No, no photos or attributes | Second possible cause |
| Action | Maintain | Complete the profile, tackle reviews | Measure again next month |
From figure to task
The example shows why ratios work. On views, A and B look the same. Only actions per thousand views shows that B is falling behind, and the underlying KPIs point to causes you can fix. That turns a report into a task list.
How do you set up metrics per location in four steps?
Start with a baseline measurement: where do the profiles, rankings and reviews of each location stand today? We do that with a free baseline measurement of your locations. Then choose the core KPIs per goal, test them in a pilot with a group of locations and only roll out once the definitions are right. AI helps us collect the data from all profiles and flag deviations; a person decides what needs to happen.
Want to see how other topics connect to this, such as map services or social media per location? Then take a look at our franchise marketing knowledge base. You will also find background on local measurement and testing at our test lab LocalSEOLab.nl.
What does a location outside the Google Maps top 3 cost you?
This calculation uses Dutch figures instead of American click-through rates. The average revenue per franchise location comes from the Dutch Franchise Association (NFV) statistics, reference year 2025. Nobody can say in advance exactly how much revenue a location loses without a top position in Google Maps, with a Google Business Profile that is not in order, or without proper review management. So you calculate a scenario per cause: a few percent of revenue going to a more visible competitor. Add them up and you see the combined cost.
| Sector | Revenue per location per year | 1% revenue missed | 3% revenue missed | Growth package (€4,800 a year) as share of revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All sectors (average) | €1,445,000 | €14,450 | €43,350 | 0.33% |
| Services | €480,000 | €4,800 | €14,400 | 1% |
| Hospitality | €1,230,000 | €12,300 | €36,900 | 0.39% |
| Health care | €1,270,000 | €12,700 | €38,100 | 0.38% |
| Non-food retail | €1,750,000 | €17,500 | €52,500 | 0.27% |
| Food retail | €2,910,000 | €29,100 | €87,300 | 0.16% |
| Other brands | €680,000 | €6,800 | €20,400 | 0.71% |
- 6 of the 100 largest Dutch franchise chains reply to a Google review within 24 hours; the average response time is 6.8 days and 90% has no demonstrable review management process.
- Only 40% of the 500 Google Business Profiles examined is fully completed.
- In the measurement one review was viewed around 15,000 times on average: an unanswered complaint stays visible to thousands of people.
- 42% of consumers would rather not do business with a company that never replies to reviews (BrightLocal 2026).
Sources: NFV Franchise Statistics, reference year 2025 (34,937 locations, €50.5 billion revenue); Local SEO Franchise Benchmark 2026 (100 largest chains, 500 profiles); sector model on franchiseseo.nl (in Dutch). The percentages are scenarios you choose, not a measurement or a promise. We do not promise rankings or revenue.
Questions about KPIs and measuring per location
How many KPIs should a franchise brand track per location?
What is the difference between a leading KPI and an outcome KPI?
Why not simply compare a location with the chain average?
How do you measure visibility in ChatGPT or Gemini when there are no figures?
Is the number of social media followers a good KPI for locations?
How often should you report KPIs per location?
Who owns a KPI: head office or the franchisee?
Which KPI shows fastest whether review management is working?
How do you link advertising costs to results per location?
Can I use KPIs to show what franchisees' marketing contributions deliver?
Sources

Gijs Bodenstaff
Franchise marketer, local SEO and GEO specialist, author
Request the free visibility scan and get a baseline measurement of the KPIs of every location.
